Easyjet? No grazie !   Cliccate qui per scoprire perché
Easyjet? No thanks !   Click here to discover why


 

 

 

 

                                                     Brussels, 18.10.2007

                                                     COM(2007) 639 final

 

                                                     2005/0260 (COD)

 

                                                      

 

 

                       COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

                           TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

                                               

           pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty

                                                

                                        concerning the

 

     Common Position of the Council on the adoption of a proposal for a Directive of the

     European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on

     the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative

     Action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities

                           (Audiovisual Media Services Directive)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EN    EN

 


 

 

       

                                                              2005/0260 (COD)

 

                            COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

                                      TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

                                                         

                  pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty

                                                         

                                                 concerning the

 

            Common Position of the Council on the adoption of a proposal for a Directive of the

            European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on

            the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative

            Action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities

                                      (Audiovisual Media Services Directive)

 

 

       1. BACKGROUND

 

       Date of transmission of the proposal to the European Parliament and  15 December 2005

       the Council [(document COM(2005) 646 -2005/0260(COD)]:

 

       Date of the opinion of the European Economic and Social  13 September 2006

       Committee:                                                                [CESC 1178/2006]

 

       Date of the opinion of the European Parliament, first reading:            13 December 2006

 

       Date of transmission of the amended proposal:                             29 March 2007

 

       Date of adoption of the Common Position:                                  15 October 2007

 

       2. OBJECTIVE OF THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL

 

       The aim of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD) is to deepen the internal

       market for non-linear/on-demand audiovisual services (minimum harmonisation with regard

       to protection of minors, hate speech, commercial communication) on the basis of the country-

       of-establishment principle, and to modernize the rules, especially advertising rules, for

       linear/broadcast services.

 

 

       3. COMMENTS ON THE COMMON POSITION

 

       3.1        General Comment on Common Position

 

       The (political agreement on the) Common Position is, in substance and to a large extent, in

       line with the Commission's proposal and therefore can be supported fully. This is especially

       true for rules on scope, commercial communication, product placement, short reports, media

       pluralism, media literacy and co-regulation. 

 

       3.2      Agreement at Common Position Stage

 

 

EN                                                       2 

                                                                                                        

                                                                                                        EN

 


 

 

       

       The Common Position is the result of intense inter-institutional negotiations. The Chair of the

       CULT Committee, Mr Nikolaos Sifunakis, confirmed the agreement in a letter of 21 May

       2007 to Dr. P. Witt, President of the COREPER.

 

       At the Council meeting on 24 May, the Commission took note with satisfaction that the co-

       legislators made the choice not to modify the rules that define the place of establishment of a

       media service provider in Article 2 and reaffirmed the right of a broadcaster to offer its

       services in the Internal market from the country of establishment he chooses. As concerns

       stricter national rules (Article 3), the Audiovisual Media Services Directive provides a new

       procedure regarding broadcasters possibly circumventing the stricter rules of a Member State

       having availed itself of the faculty to adopt such rules that are compatible with Community

       law. 

 

       The Commission is confident that the first stage of the procedure, consisting of cooperation

       between the Member States concerned on a "best endeavours" basis, will enable most

       difficulties to be solved at an early stage. Should the non-binding cooperation stage fail, a

       second, formal stage would begin, where the European Commission would play its role

       according to the new procedure set in place, which is to examine the compatibility of the

       Member State's proposed measures with Community law. If the proposed measures are

       deemed by the Commission not to be compatible with Community Law, the Member State

       concerned must refrain from taking them. The Commission considers that these procedural

       provisions safeguard the "country of establishment" principle.

       With regard to short reporting for general new purposes the compromise provision is

       acceptable for the Commission. On compensation the compromise wording reads: "Where

       compensation is provided for, it shall not exceed the additional costs directly incurred in

       providing access." This wording was chosen to ensure that the right to short reporting can not

       be read as compulsory license which would have given the receiving broadcasters wider

       rights. This solution is largely supported by all stakeholders, broadcasters as well as rights

       owners. 

       As regards the ban on discrimination in audiovisual commercial communications, Article

       3d(1) c) of the common position, the Council accepted, in response to Parliament's request,

       that the compromise text should refer to all the categories of discrimination mentioned in

       Article 13 of the Treaty and read "must not include or promote ---". This is acceptable for the

       Commission.

 

       With regard to the independence of regulatory  authorities the Presidency proposed a

       reference in a recital referring to the faculty for Member States to create independent national

       regulatory bodies. These should be independent from national governments as well as from

       operators. The EP and the Commission found it necessary that the reference to such bodies be

       included in the operative part of the Directive. The compromise in Article 23b, which is

       acceptable to the Commission, reads: "Member States shall take appropriate measures to

       provide each other and the Commission with the information necessary for the application of

       the provisions of this Directive, in particular Articles 2, 2a and 3 thereof, notably through

       their competent independent regulatory bodies."1

 

 

                                                       

       1           Original Commission Proposal (Art. 23b.):

                   "1. Member States shall guarantee the independence of national regulatory authorities and ensure that

                   they exercise their powers impartially and transparently. 2. National regulatory authorities shall provide

 

EN                                                                 3 

                                                                                                                                  

                                                                                                                                  EN

 


 

 

       

       4. CONCLUSION

 

       The Common Position meets the aims of the Commission's initial and modified proposals.

       The Commission therefore supports the text.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                               

                   each other and the Commission with the information necessary for the application of the provisions of

                   this Directive."

 

EN                                                                               4 

                                                                                                                                                                

                                                                                                                                                                    EN