|
Brussels, 18.10.2007
COM(2007) 639 final
2005/0260 (COD)
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
TO THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT
pursuant to the second subparagraph
of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty
concerning the
Common Position of the Council on the
adoption of a proposal for a Directive of the
European Parliament and of the Council
amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on
the coordination of certain provisions
laid down by law, regulation or administrative
Action in Member States concerning the
pursuit of television broadcasting activities
(Audiovisual Media
Services Directive)
EN EN
2005/0260 (COD)
COMMUNICATION FROM
THE COMMISSION
TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
pursuant to the second
subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty
concerning the
Common Position of the Council on
the adoption of a proposal for a Directive of the
European Parliament and of the
Council amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on
the coordination of certain
provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative
Action in Member States concerning
the pursuit of television broadcasting activities
(Audiovisual Media Services Directive)
1. BACKGROUND
Date of transmission of the proposal to
the European Parliament and 15 December
2005
the Council [(document COM(2005) 646
-2005/0260(COD)]:
Date of the opinion of the European Economic
and Social 13 September 2006
Committee:
[CESC 1178/2006]
Date of the opinion of the European
Parliament, first reading: 13
December 2006
Date of transmission of the amended
proposal: 29
March 2007
Date of adoption of the Common
Position:
15 October 2007
2. OBJECTIVE OF THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL
The aim of the Audiovisual Media
Services Directive (AVMSD) is to deepen the internal
market for non-linear/on-demand
audiovisual services (minimum harmonisation with regard
to protection of minors, hate speech,
commercial communication) on the basis of the country-
of-establishment principle, and to
modernize the rules, especially advertising rules, for
linear/broadcast services.
3. COMMENTS ON THE COMMON POSITION
3.1 General Comment on Common Position
The (political agreement on the) Common
Position is, in substance and to a large extent, in
line with the Commission's proposal and
therefore can be supported fully. This is especially
true for rules on scope, commercial communication,
product placement, short reports, media
pluralism, media literacy and
co-regulation.
3.2 Agreement at Common Position Stage
EN 2
EN
The Common Position is the result of
intense inter-institutional negotiations. The Chair of the
CULT Committee, Mr Nikolaos Sifunakis,
confirmed the agreement in a letter of 21 May
2007 to Dr. P. Witt, President of the
COREPER.
At the Council meeting on 24 May, the
Commission took note with satisfaction that the co-
legislators made the choice not to
modify the rules that define the place of establishment of a
media service provider in Article 2 and
reaffirmed the right of a broadcaster to offer its
services in the Internal market from the country of
establishment he chooses. As concerns
stricter national rules (Article 3),
the Audiovisual Media Services Directive provides a new
procedure regarding broadcasters
possibly circumventing the stricter rules of a Member State
having availed itself of the faculty to
adopt such rules that are compatible with Community
law.
The Commission is confident that the
first stage of the procedure, consisting of cooperation
between the Member States concerned on
a "best endeavours" basis, will enable most
difficulties to be solved at an early
stage. Should the non-binding cooperation stage fail, a
second, formal stage would begin, where
the European Commission would play its role
according to the new procedure set in
place, which is to examine the compatibility of the
Member State's proposed measures with
Community law. If the proposed measures are
deemed by the Commission not to be
compatible with Community Law, the Member State
concerned must refrain from taking
them. The Commission considers that these procedural
provisions safeguard the "country
of establishment" principle.
With regard to short reporting for
general new purposes the compromise provision is
acceptable for the Commission. On
compensation the compromise wording reads: "Where
compensation is provided for, it shall
not exceed the additional costs directly incurred in
providing access." This wording
was chosen to ensure that the right to short reporting can not
be read as compulsory license which
would have given the receiving broadcasters wider
rights. This solution is largely supported
by all stakeholders, broadcasters as well as rights
owners.
As regards the ban on discrimination in
audiovisual commercial communications, Article
3d(1) c) of the common position, the
Council accepted, in response to Parliament's request,
that the compromise text should refer
to all the categories of discrimination mentioned in
Article 13 of the Treaty and read
"must not include or promote ---". This is acceptable for the
Commission.
With regard to the independence of
regulatory authorities the Presidency
proposed a
reference in a recital referring to the
faculty for Member States to create independent national
regulatory bodies. These should be
independent from national governments as well as from
operators. The EP and the Commission
found it necessary that the reference to such bodies be
included in the operative part of the
Directive. The compromise in Article 23b, which is
acceptable to the Commission, reads:
"Member States shall take appropriate measures to
provide each other and the Commission
with the information necessary for the application of
the provisions of this Directive, in
particular Articles 2, 2a and 3 thereof, notably through
their competent independent regulatory
bodies."1
1 Original Commission Proposal (Art. 23b.):
"1. Member States
shall guarantee the independence of national regulatory authorities and ensure
that
they exercise their powers
impartially and transparently. 2. National regulatory authorities shall provide
EN 3
EN
4. CONCLUSION
The Common Position meets the aims of
the Commission's initial and modified proposals.
The Commission therefore supports the
text.
each other and the
Commission with the information necessary for the application of the provisions
of
this Directive."
EN
4
EN