|
Brussels, 19.11.2008
COM(2008)707 final
2007/0163 (COD)
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 251 (2) of the EC Treaty
concerning the
Common position of the Council on the adoption of a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council establishing the European Training Foundation (recast)
1. BACKGROUND
|
Date of transmission of the proposal to the European
Parliament and the Council: COM/2007/443final – 2007/0163(COD)]: 25 July 2007 |
|
|
Date of the opinion of the
European Parliament, first reading: 22 May 2008 |
|
|
Date of adoption of the
Common Position: 17 November 2008 |
|
|
The
European Training Foundation (ETF) was created in 1990 to support
implementation of the PHARE external assistance programme in the vocational
training field. At the present date, it also covers the countries of the
previous TACIS, CARDS and MEDA programmes. The ETF Regulation was amended
three times (in 1994, 1998 and 2000) to extend the geographical scope and a
fourth time in 2003 to bring it into line with the Financial Regulation. Since 2003
there have been important developments in the European Union's policy outlook
in both education and training and external relations fields, while new
instruments have been adopted to implement these policies. Accordingly, a new
amendment to the ETF founding Regulation became necessary to take into
account recent developments, to update its role and function and to provide a
sound basis for its future work. |
|
2. OBJECTIVE OF THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL
The Commission's proposal has the following objectives:
· Clarify the functions of the ETF
· Update the mandate of the ETF redefining its geographical and thematic scope
· Modernise its governing structures with a view to promote effective decision-making
· Provide a sound basis for ETF's future work.
3. COMMENTS ON THE COMMON POSITION
3.1 General Comment on Common Position
The text of the Common
Position is, in substance and to a large extent, in line with the Commission's
proposal and therefore can be supported fully. It is the result of intense
inter-institutional negotiations, following the Commission's proposal on the
revision of the regulation 1360/90 of 7 May 1990. The Commission sent its
proposal to Council and Parliament on 25 July 2007.
3.2 Agreement at Common Position Stage
A detailed examination of the articles was conducted at the Education
committee in the Council and, in parallel, in the Employment Committee of the
European Parliament.
The dialogue with the Council and the Parliament has been constructive
and produced a series of amendments that improve the clarity of the original
version
Within this context, informal and technical meetings have pinpointed avenues for compromise on a number of outstanding
issues: thematic remit, functions, legal basis, geographical scope, budgetary
implications, composition of the Governing board and procedure for appointing
the director of the ETF.
On 30 April 2008, COREPER
gave mandate to the Presidency on a compromise package which should allow a
first reading agreement. The first reading agreement was not, however, accepted
by the European Parliament at the plenary session on 22 May 2008.
The
main subjects of negotiation on which an agreement had been reached were the
following:
The
thematic remit: The ETF recast foresees a wider perception of training
in the context of a lifelong learning as a key factor for the development of
economies and knowledge societies in accordance with the Lisbon objectives.
Moreover, the recast regulation would allow the ETF to assume a leading role in
the reform of vocational education and training (VET) and related labour market
issues in partner countries as part of a wider programme of Human Capital
Development (HCD).
The
functions: The
introduction of the new external relations policy instruments, which are
designed to help partner countries achieve reforms in different sectors, marks
a significant step towards policy-driven rather than programme-driven approach
to external assistance. In this context the ETF needs a mandate that allows it
to fully play its role as a centre of expertise assisting both partner
countries and European Commission in the development of policies and
appropriate reform strategies.
Concerning
the partner countries, the ETF will assist them in capacity building and in the
definition and implementation of reform strategies adapted to the national
context.
Moreover,
the ETF will promote networking and exchange of experiences and good practices
between the EU and partner countries and among partner countries themselves.
Legal
basis: The Commission's proposal replaces the previously used Article 235 of the
Treaty establishing the European Community by Article 150 as ETF remains
closely related to the EU policy in vocational education and training (VET).
This legal basis provides more clarity in the work and functions of the ETF.
Nevertheless, VET needs to be understood not in its traditional sense but in
the global context of a lifelong learning policy, including aspects such as
labour-market issues, social inclusion and civic participation. In this sense,
Article 150 provides a sufficient legal basis for the work of the ETF within
its new broader thematic remit.
Geographical
scope: The
ETF maintains its geographical focus in accession and neighbouring countries of
the EU through the Instrument for Pre-accession (IPA) and the European
Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI). However, the new regulation
also provides the ETF with the possibility to operate in other regions, in
accordance with EU external relations priorities and on the basis of an ad hoc
decision taken by the ETF Governing Board on proposal from the Commission.
Budgetary
implications: This proposal does not introduce any new activities for the ETF. Its
objective is rather to provide for an updated and clearer definition of ETF's
current functions, under a wider thematic remit and a renewed geographical
scope. There are not budgetary implications, however, the new focus on
information and policy analysis tasks is a labour intensive work and requires
an important investment on behalf of the ETF in terms of staff training and
qualification.
As
regards the two remaining issues, the position of the Commission is as follows:
Composition
of the Governing Board: Although the Commission regrets that its original position on the issue has
not been accepted by Council and Parliament (six representatives of Member
States and six representatives of the Commission) it can accept the compromise
solution consisting of one representative per Member State, three
representatives of the Commission and three non voting experts from the
European Parliament, as well as three representatives of partner countries as
observers.
Procedure
for appointing the director of the ETF: The Commission can accept the
proposal that the candidate selected by the Governing Board would be invited
for a hearing by the competent committee/s of the EP.
4. CONCLUSION
The Common Position meets the aims of the Commission's initial proposal. The Commission therefore supports the text. Since the two co-legislators have reached a political agreement on the Common Position, second reading proceedings of Parliament in accepting the Council's Common Position should be concluded relatively swiftly.