![]() |
Toyota Prius: ammiratela ma non compratela. Cliccate qui per scoprirne il motivo |
Brussels, 1.3.2010
COM(2010)66 final
GREEN PAPER
On Forest Protection and Information in the EU:
Preparing forests for climate change
1. Introduction
The purpose of this Green Paper is to launch the debate on
options for a European Union (EU) approach to forest protection and information
in the framework of the EU
Forest Action Plan, as announced by the
Commission in the White Paper "Adapting to Climate Change: towards a European
Framework for action"[1].
The Council conclusions of 25 June 2009 on this White Paper underlined that
climate change has had and will have an impact, inter alia, on forests. As
these impacts will have socio-economic and environmental consequences, it is
opportune to prepare now so that EU forests can continue to perform all their
functions under changing climatic conditions.
In this context, forest protection in the EU should aim at
ensuring that forests continue to perform all their productive, socio-economic
and environmental functions in the future.
Competence for forest policy lies primarily with the Member
States, (MS) under the subsidiarity principle[2].
The role of the EU is limited and designed principally to add value to national
forest policies and programs by:
–
monitoring and possibly reporting on the state of EU forests,
–
anticipating global trends and drawing MS' attention to
emerging challenges and,
–
proposing and possibly coordinating or supporting options for
early action at EU scale.
–
The debate launched by this paper should therefore focus on how
climate change modifies the terms of forest management and protection in Europe
and how the EU policy should evolve to enhance its contribution to MS'
forest-related initiatives. What challenges do we face, how can the EU help
address them, what are our additional information needs?
Globally, the importance of protecting forests and managing them
sustainably has been acknowledged since the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development in 1992 adopted the “Rio forest principles[3]”.
The United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
recognizes the importance of forests in the global greenhouse gas (GHG) balance
and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD[4])
addresses forest biodiversity through an expanded work programme. The United
Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) also acknowledges the
important contribution of forests to the achievement of its goals.
At international level,
the EU is contributing to better forest protection through the Forest Law
Enforcement Governance and Trade Action Plan[5]
and an initiative in the context of reducing emissions from deforestation and
forest degradation[6], which
contributes to the post-2012 discussions under the UNFCCC.
At pan-European level,
the Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE)[7]
defined, in 1993, sustainable forest management (SFM) as "The stewardship
and use of forest lands in a way, and at a rate, that maintains their
biodiversity, productivity, regeneration capacity, vitality and their potential
to fulfil, now and in the future, relevant ecological, economic and social
functions, at local, national and global levels, and that does not cause damage
to other ecosystems". Subsequent
conferences[8]
have produced recommendations for SFM and forest protection as well as criteria
and indicators for national reporting. All EU MS and the Commission have signed
the MCPFE resolutions confirming SFM and multi-functionality as the core
approach to forestry.
At EU level, the
Forestry Strategy (FS) for the EU[9]
sets out common principles of EU forestry – SFM and multi-functionality - and
lists international processes and activities to be followed at EU level. The EU Forest Action Plan (FAP)[10]
builds on the FS and serves as a coordination tool for forest related
activities and policies at EU level. It aims, inter alia, to
maintain and appropriately enhance biodiversity, carbon sequestration,
integrity, health and resilience of forest ecosystems at multiple geographical
scales because well functioning forest ecosystems are key to maintaining
productive capacity. It foresees working towards a European forest monitoring
system and enhancing the protection of EU forests.
This Green Paper
–
identifies briefly the general situation and global relevance
of forests;
–
describes the characteristics of EU forests and their
functions;
–
identifies the main challenges faced by EU forests in a
changing climate and how they could compromise forest functions;
–
presents an overview of the tools available to ensure forest
protection, and of the existing forest information systems that could be used
to address the challenges and monitor environmental impacts and effects of
actions.
In addition, it raises a series of questions relevant to developing
options for future forest protection and information in the EU under a changing
climate. The responses from EU institutions, MS, EU citizens and other
interested stakeholders will inform and guide Commission considerations
regarding any additional action at EU level to better prepare EU forests for
climate change, and enhance the fulfilment of their functions. It may also
provide input for discussions concerning the possible update of the EU Forest
Strategy on climate related aspects.
2. The state of Forests – Forest
Functions
2.1. What
is a forest?
While there is no common definition agreed among EU MS of what
constitutes a forest, the definitions used by the Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO) and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE)[11]
in their periodic assessments of forest resources and also by the MCPFE provide
an adequate working description for the purpose of reflecting on forest
protection.
"Forest": Land
with tree crown cover (or equivalent stocking level) of more than 10 percent
and area of more than 0.5 ha. The trees should be able to reach a minimum
height of 5 m at maturity in situ.
"Other wooded land" (OWL): Land either with a tree crown
cover (or equivalent stocking level) of 5-10 percent of trees able to reach a
height of 5 m at maturity in situ; or a crown cover (or equivalent stocking
level) of more than 10 percent of trees not able to reach a height of 5 m at
maturity in situ and shrub or bush cover.
2.2. Forest
cover
Worldwide, historical demand for land, timber products and
energy has removed a large part of the Earth's original forest cover, most of
it during the 20th century. Forests now cover less than 30 % of the Earth's
land surface and are steadily decreasing in area[12].
Current deforestation, mostly in developing countries, and other related land use
changes still cause about 12-15 % of global CO2 emissions[13].
Most European land was once covered by forests. Since human
settlement began, forest area and composition have been gradually but
substantially influenced by man over a period of several thousand years[14]. The majority of EU forests now consist of
semi-natural stands and plantations of indigenous or introduced species.
The EU currently contains 5 % of the world's forests and EU forests
have continuously expanded for over 60 years, although recently at a lower rate.
EU Forests and OWL now cover 155 million ha and 21 million ha, respectively,
together more than 42 % of EU land area[15].
Most of EU forests, including those under continuous management, have also
grown in terms of wood volume and carbon stock, thus effectively removing CO2
from the atmosphere.
2.3. Forest
functions
Forests are among the
most bio-diverse terrestrial ecosystems. In healthy, biologically
diverse forests this complexity allows organisms and their populations to adapt
to changing environmental conditions and to retain overall stability of the
ecosystem[16]. Forests
grow slowly: trees take years to regenerate, decades to grow and the final use
of young stands is sometimes difficult to predict when they are established.
Forests serve multiple and interrelated social, economic and
environmental functions, often at the same time and place. Safeguarding such
multi-functionality requires balanced management approaches based on adequate
forest information.
2.3.1. Socio-economic
functions
2.3.1.1. Forests
provide jobs, income and raw materials for industry and for renewable energy.
While EU forest owners estimate their number at 16 million[17],
about 350.000 people are directly employed in forest management. The main
income from most forest holdings depends on wood production. Primary
forest-based industries (FBI) provide sawn wood, wood-based panels, pulp for
paper, firewood as well as forest chips and bark for bio-energy, accounting for
more than 2 million jobs, often in rural small and medium enterprises, and a
€300 billion turnover[18].
The European Forest Sector Outlook Study report[19]
has called for improving the appeal, training opportunities and security
standards of forest jobs.
Wood supports a large downstream value chain including
industries such as furniture, construction, printing and packaging. The forest
sector provides around 8 % of the total added value from manufacturing. The
economic importance of the sector in rural areas is very high as sustainably
managed forests build the backbone of the provision of wood to the FBI. Forest
based raw materials, goods and services can also be one of the most important
bases for economic recovery and "green growth" in rural areas.
Wood production for industry
steadily increased from 1950 to 1990 in Western Europe and then levelled out
until 2000. Despite higher costs for processing small timber and required changes
in forest management, this trend was possible due to new processing and
manufacturing technologies, especially in the 1970s and 1980s[20]
and later, increasing paper recycling[21].
A similar trend occurred in Eastern Europe with the levelling beginning around
1985.
However, against a backcloth
of forest expansion and higher per hectare stocking rates, the EU forest
utilisation rate, measured as the ratio of felling to increment, declined overall
from 1950[22] until early this century. Since then, increase
in demand for wood products has been supplemented by that from bio-energy
developments.
There is
potential to further increase sustainable wood mobilisation within the EU,
while paying due attention to all other forest functions. But balancing issues of competitiveness of the forest based
industries, economic viability, environment, fragmentation of ownership,
organisation and motivation of forest owners poses considerable challenges and will require further information
efforts.
Reaching the 20 % renewable energy share objective of the EU
Climate and Energy Package could multiply total biomass demand from agriculture
and forests by a factor 2 to 3[23],
including a substantial increase in efficiency of biomass production and use.
Projections made by the
UN-ECE and FAO[24] suggest a possible
imbalance between supply and demand to meet existing material use and extrapolated
renewable energy needs, if the importance of wood in the biomass component of
the total renewable energy supply remains constant.
Under this scenario it
has been estimated[25] that, due to steadily growing demand, the ratio
of fellings over net annual increment could temporarily increase in some
European countries to over 100 %, causing a decline in growing stock after
2020. While a temporary high utilisation rate is not necessarily unsustainable,
given that the forest age-class structure is positively skewed in many MS, it could
turn forests from a carbon sink into a temporary source. Raising utilisation
rates may also help to decrease instability of aging stands, saturation effects
in old forests and vulnerability to forest fires, storms and pests thereby counteracting
the risk that EU forests turn into a carbon source.
Targeted and timely forest information will be crucial for
determining the role wood can play as a raw material for the wood-processing
industry and for energy generation. Under the above scenario, maintaining the
potential for sustainable wood supply will require:
– Developing
new domestic sources of wood, notably through expansion of the area used to
grow and harvest wood;
– Mobilising
wood from existing domestic sources (forest and non-forest), e.g. through
higher wood removals;
– Increasing
efficiency in the production and the use of wood;
–
Increasing imports of wood raw materials.
Achieving the above while retaining or enhancing all other
forest functions will pose new challenges for SFM at all levels. In the light
of adaptation of forests to climate change this could include restructuring
measures like changes in tree composition as well as more frequent and early
thinnings, depending on the local situation.
In addition to wood products, non-wood goods and services
provide, in some European regions, more revenue than wood sales[26].
Innovative methods
for the valuation of non marketed forest products and services have been
investigated by the Commission[27].
Biodiversity protection, recreation, carbon sequestration and watershed
services are the most important non-market services but are generally
unrewarded due to the fact that they often have the status of public goods.
2.3.1.2. Forests
protect settlements and infrastructure,
Forests are a key component of the European landscape. Many
mountain areas in Europe would be uninhabitable without forests that prevent
landslides, mudflows, rock fall and avalanches from affecting roads, railways,
cultivated areas and entire settlements. Such protective forests have to be
especially managed to provide a stable and continuous vegetation cover. In
Austria, 19 % of the total forest area has been designated by the 1975 Forest
Act protective forests. French forest legislation distinguishes between several
types of protective forests: "forêts
de montagne, forêt alluviale, forêt périurbaine ou littorale".
Forests managed for amenity
purposes (including seldom marketed amenities such as hunting, recreation,
landscape value, berry and mushroom picking) raise the value of neighbouring
estates, encourage tourism, contribute to health and well-being and are part of
European cultural heritage.
2.3.2. Environmental
functions – ecosystem services
2.3.2.1. Forests
protect soil
Forest areas play a role in preserving landscapes and soil
fertility. Forests prevent soil erosion and
desertification especially in mountains or semi arid areas, mostly by limiting
runoff and lowering wind speed. They also deepen and enrich[28]
the soils upon which they grow due to their coarse and fine roots, which
increase the weathering of rocks and whose degradation is a major source of
soil organic matter (SOM), and so contribute to soil fertility, productivity and
carbon sequestration. Efforts in afforestation and reforestation, leading to an
increasing forest area in the EU, as well as natural regeneration, growing
shares of mixed forests and soil friendly harvesting machinery support this function.
On the other hand, intensification measures such as shortening of rotations and
use of forest logging residues, stumps and roots can damage and impoverish
soils, and cause additional GHG emissions under certain site conditions[29]
and depending on the local situation.
2.3.2.2. Forests
regulate freshwater supplies
Forests play a major role in the storage, purification and
release of water to surface water bodies and subsurface aquifers. Their
purification role, including that of forest soils[30],
includes breaking down or absorbing most air pollutants carried by rain. Their
soils buffer large quantities of water, reducing flooding. Many MS make use of
the water regulating role of forests in the provision of drinking water. In
Belgium, water from the Ardennes forest area is the principal supply source for
Brussels and Flanders. In Germany, two thirds of the "Wasserschutzgebiete"[31]
for abstraction of high quality drinking water is under forest cover. In Spain,
forests in upper river catchments have been given special conservation status
because of their capacity to improve water quality.
2.3.2.3. Forests
conserve biodiversity
Forests are a key component of European nature and they are home
to the largest number of vertebrates on the continent. Several dominant tree
species (e.g. European beech and holm oak) are virtually restricted to Europe,
giving European forests a distinctive nature. Thousands of species of insects
and invertebrates as well as many plants are confined to forest habitats
primarily constituted by these trees. Biodiversity conservation (from genetics
to landscape scales) improves forest resilience and adaptive capacity[32].
Forest habitat types designated as Natura 2000 sites cover over 14 million ha,
constituting almost 20 % of the whole terrestrial Natura 2000 network.
Forests undisturbed by man[33][34],
account for about 9 million ha, ca 5 % of total forest area in the EEA region[35].
Such forest habitats have been the source of many of the cultivated plants,
wild fruits, and medicines in use today and should continue to fulfil that
function for future generations. Forests in SE Europe, Fenno-Scandia and the
Baltic area are strongholds of large carnivores such as the wolf, bear and lynx
which are mostly extinct elsewhere in the EU.
Active forest management can create more diverse habitat
structures, by mimicking natural disturbances, which in turn can favour higher
species diversity[36],
in comparison to no management.
The recent Commission assessment
of the conservation status of Europe's most vulnerable habitats and species
protected under the Habitats Directive[37]
indicates that grassland, wetland and coastal habitat types are under most
pressure, while one third of forest habitats of Community interest[38]
are in a favourable conservation status. But this situation is quite regionally
varied and general trends are not evident. Reporting on the EU's 2010
biodiversity target indicates that certain forest bird populations, have now
stabilized after decline, while deadwood remains below optimal levels from a
biodiversity perspective in most European countries [39].
It also has to be noted that some challenges to forest biodiversity can
originate outside the forest sector.
Recent biodiversity monitoring of forests at EU level[40]
has provided a baseline with harmonized and comparable information on tree
species richness, stand structure, forest types, deadwood, and ground
vegetation. Results include the fact that most of the surveyed forests are
between 60-80 years old and are mainly composed of one to two tree species, occasionally
reaching more than 10. However, it should also be kept in mind that overall
biodiversity is known to depend not only on tree species but as well on stand
structure and resulting light conditions.
2.3.3. The
role of forests in climate regulation
2.3.3.1. Forests
as sinks and sources of carbon
Forests are an essential link in the global carbon cycle because
of their capacity to remove CO2 from the atmosphere and to store it
in their biomass and soil thus acting as a sink. Their growth counteracts rising
GHG concentrations in the atmosphere. On the other hand, forest degradation
and/or conversion to other land use can cause substantial GHG emissions due to
fires, biomass decay and/or mineralisation of SOM, leading to forests becoming
a CO2 source.
National forest inventories (NFI) are the most important data
sources for the estimation of whether forest are sinks or sources of CO2.
Currently, NFIs indicate that EU forest increment is higher than fellings. On
this basis, EU forests accumulate carbon and therefore “forest land” currently
acts as a net carbon sink[41]:
It removes ca. 0.5 Gt of CO2/yr, compared to EU-27 industrial GHG
emissions of 5 Gt CO2 equivalent /yr[42].
However, the combined effects of climate change (e.g. more frequent very strong
storms[43]),
prevalence of older stands and possible unforeseen increases in timber
harvesting may have an impact on this sink capacity.
In this context, it is important that forests can provide
renewable materials and energy which can be used as a substitute for more carbon
intensive products and energy sources. More carbon in standing timber and wood
products as well as reduced utilisation of fossil fuels means less GHG in the
atmosphere.
In the long term, a sustainable forest management strategy aimed
at maintaining or increasing forest carbon stocks while producing an annual
sustained yield of timber, fibre or energy is expected to generate the largest
sustained mitigation benefit[44].
2.3.3.2. Forests
as regulators of local and regional weather
Evapo-transpiration by all vegetation is responsible for about
2/3 of total water injection from land to air[45].
Forests not only store but also evaporate huge amounts of water, complementing
the flux of oceanic moisture moving inland[46].
Forests therefore play a major role in the atmospheric circulation and the
water cycle[47] on land and
may have a role in mitigating regional climate, desertification and water
security problems.
Deforestation has a direct impact on wind and weather patterns
globally and locally through modifications of the water cycle. However, in
certain arid areas, forests can increase water deficits through higher
evapo-transpiration than alternative vegetation types. This is particularly
true for water-demanding fast-growing tree species and varieties planted on inappropriate
sites[48].
Available information on forest influence on weather patterns is
international rather than European. Investigations focussing on such influences
in Europe would be desirable. Still, it will not be possible to apportion what
part of changes results from climate change without long-term observation.
Question 1:
Do you think maintaining, balancing and enhancing forest functions
should be given more attention? If so, on what level should action be taken,
EU, national and/or other? How should it be done?
3. Impacts of climate change on forests
Forests have developed together with the naturally changing
climate over the millennia. As climate shifted slowly, and the natural
environment presented few barriers, species and communities could adapt and
evolve more easily[49].
Most EU forest management is aimed at developing forests that are well adapted
to local growing conditions. However the rapid rate of human-induced climate
change is now overcoming the natural ability of ecosystems to adapt. The rate
of temperature increase is unprecedented. A fragmented landscape, often
simplified forest composition and structure and pressures such as forest
dieback, new pests and storms make autonomous forest adaptation much more
difficult. Therefore, increased human intervention regarding species choice and
management techniques is likely to be required to maintain viable forest cover and
continuity of all forest functions. Some regions may experience more favourable
conditions for forest growth in the medium term.
Mean temperatures in Europe have now risen by almost 1° C[50]
during the past century and are expected to climb further, the most optimistic
scenario forecasting an increase of 2° C by 2100. A change of this magnitude
corresponds to the difference in the temperature optimum of forest types as
different as spruce versus beech forest or beech versus oak stands. It
will thus alter the suitability of whole regions for certain forest types,
forcing a shift in natural species distribution and leading to changes in
growth of existing stands. In addition extreme events (storms, forest fires, droughts
and heatwaves) are expected to become much more common[51]
and/or severe.
Even without climate change, the capacity of forests to carry
out their functions has always been under pressure from various natural
hazards. While it is clear that in general climate change exacerbates such
hazards, it is impossible to accurately quantify how much impact is due only to
climate change compared to historical levels. For this reason, the impacts on
forest functions from both endemic and climate change causes are considered as
a whole.
3.1. Shifting
environmental conditions and dieback
Overall, projections of the net effects of climate change on EU
forest species' populations in the medium term are complex[52]:
In the Northwest of Europe, where water supplies are, typically,
less limiting, growth rates are likely to be enhanced by a combination of
rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, a longer growing season and
increased nutrient availability as a result of atmospheric deposition and
increased soil mineralisation.
In Southern Europe, where water availability is a critical
factor, more frequent summer droughts may lead to reduced productivity and
resilience. Following droughts and heatwaves, forest decline has been observed
over the last few decades in Mediterranean countries with dieback and death of
several pine and oak species[53],
generally attributed to dryer and warmer climatic conditions[54]
and often combined with biotic factors (insect pests and diseases).
Longer term projections are more uncertain and depend on the
winter resistance and summer resistance of affected forest types and species. As an example, the
loss of Alpine habitat suitable to Arolla pine at lower elevations would be 2.4
times the gain due to a shift in upward altitudinal distribution.[55]
Changing climate is also likely to[56]:
–
increase the levels of damage caused by domestic forest
pathogens and pests;
–
bring new exotic infestations, whether introduced by man or
migrating naturally ;
–
changes in population dynamics.
3.2. Destructive storms
Historical time series about storm damage in the EU are patchy
and will require more research in the future to allow adequate risk analysis
for the forest sector. During the past 10 years, however, large damaging storms
have occurred in Europe more frequently. Storms have become the single most
damaging factor in temperate Europe and storm losses now exceed 50 % of all types
of forest-related damage[57].
In January, 2005, a severe storm ("Gudrun") raged through Northern
Europe, throwing over and damaging nearly an entire year’s harvest (75 million
m³) for the whole of Sweden. In 2007, the storm “Kyrill” caused extensive
damage across NW lowland Europe. In January 2009 another major storm, “Klaus”,
levelled enormous areas of plantation forest in SW France and N Spain.
Besides the negative environmental impacts of such storms, there
are social and economical consequences linked to mobilising such huge
quantities of fallen timber much of it broken, split or up-rooted, reducing its
saleability .To optimise salvage and the chances of sale, the timber must be
logged as soon as possible, also in order to reduce the risk of further damage,
e.g. from insect attacks, fungal decay and differential drying.
Whilst on a small scale, salvage operations may temporarily
create local employment opportunities, large-scale storm damage usually
requires redeploying personnel in planning, harvesting, transporting, marketing
and storing large amounts of timber. This not only disrupts timber markets for
certain grades of wood, but also forest operations which had been foreseen.
Storm damage may also lead to expensive maintenance and repairs of traffic and
ecological infrastructures.
3.3. Large fires
Climate change is forecast to cause, especially in Southern
Europe, more droughts, higher temperatures and more windy periods. This will
raise the likelihood and severity of fires, as indicated in the graph below,
showing a strong correlation between mean burnt areas and the monthly fire
danger severity rating (MSR)[58]
of fire danger in exposed Member States[59].
This means that future weather conditions in the EU Mediterranean region are
likely to lead to an increase of the fire danger hence an increase of the
burned areas.

Currently, an average of 500,000 ha of
forest is burnt in the EU annually with associated emissions of CO2,
other gases and particles[60]. Over 50,000 forest fires are ignited each
year in the
most affected MS although this number has declined in the last decade, if
compared to previous decades.
The
higher fire risk and magnitude of forest fires have resulted in huge burnt
areas in Portugal in 2003 (more than 400,000 ha) and 2005, and in Spain, in
1985, 1989 and 1994. In Greece in 2007, when temperatures reached 46ºC, five
major fires burnt 170,000 ha in the Peloponnesus region alone.
As well as causing human casualties, damaging property and
reducing soil fertility through loss of organic matter, large fires hamper
biodiversity conservation. During summer 2009, at least 30 % of the burnt area[61]
was in Natura 2000 sites in Bulgaria, France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain
and Sweden. Seriously affected forests in Natura 2000 sites face a major
challenge to recover pre-fire condition particularly for biodiversity.
EU and MS efforts to address the issue of forest fire prevention
have been significant and focussed on training, research, awareness-raising,
and structural prevention. They will need to be stepped up as a consequence of
climate change. A clear correlation also exists between active forest
management and the reduction of fire risks: a well functioning bio-energy
market, often obstructed by lack of proper management due to fragmented forest
ownership, could have a significant fire prevention role by giving an economic
incentive to remove biomass that currently feeds wildfires in abandoned
forests.
3.4. Impacts
on forest functions
The Council Conclusions on the recent Commission white paper
"Adapting to climate change: Towards a European framework for action"
emphasized the need of mainstreaming adaptation into all relevant policies by
increasing the resilience of, i.a., forests. They further stressed the need to
improve the assessment of the impacts of climate change in all relevant sectors
and recognised the role of SFM in reducing the vulnerability of forests to
climate change.
The Council conclusions also took note of the 2009 report[62]
of the International Union of Forest Research Organizations which stated:
“Climate change over the past half-century has already affected forest
ecosystems and will have increasing effects on them in the future. The carbon
regulating services of forests are at risk of being lost entirely unless
current carbon emissions are reduced substantially; this would result in the
release of huge quantities of carbon to the atmosphere, exacerbating climate
change”.
The combined effects of climate change on forests, including
shifting environmental conditions, dieback, storms and fires will be felt
throughout Europe although at varying levels of intensity. They will have
impacts on the socio-economic and environmental functions. The challenges now
associated with particular regions are likely to spread beyond their
traditional boundaries as is already evident for fires and storms. This growing
EU wide dimension[63]
raises questions to how best the EU can contribute to ensure forests can
continue to deliver all their functions.
Question 2:
- To what extent are EU forests and the
forest sector ready to address the nature and magnitude of the challenges posed
by climate change?
- Do you consider particular regions, certain countries more
exposed/vulnerable to the effects of climate change? What sources of
information would you base your answer on?
- Would you see a need for EU-level early action to ensure all forest
functions are maintained?
- How could the EU contribute to add value to the respective efforts of
MS?
4. Tools available for Forest Protection
Today, MS have many tools at their disposal to ensure the
protection of forests. MCPFE principles, MS and relevant EU legislation, forest
information systems and SFM practices on the ground can all contribute. In
addition, the Standing Forestry Committee, the Advisory Group on Forestry and
Cork, the advisory Committee on FBI and the Expert Group on Forest Fires, chaired
by the Commission, provide for regular exchanges of views between stakeholders,
MS and the Commission.
4.1. National policies shaping forest use and forest
management
All EU MS have national (and sometimes regional) legislation on
forest management. This extends from specific forest legislation to forest
related components of other legislation..
The usual instruments found across different EU countries or
regions are:
–
National Forest Programmes;
–
Operational forestry standards;
–
Inclusive and systematic National Forest Inventories (NFI);
–
Land registry systems, an important tool for developing social
and economic forest functions and restricting illegal conversion of forests;
–
Mapping of forest functions and related planning at landscape and
regional level;
–
Forest management requirements, including management plans and
sometimes including specific management obligations in relation to certain
forest functions;
–
Requirements on the production and use of propagation
material;
–
National action plans under the CBD or UNCCD;
–
Support schemes to assist private forest owners and their
associations;
–
Legal provisions and incentives to reduce ownership
fragmentation, sometimes coupled to incentives for co-operation among forest
owners;
–
Licensing regimes that make timber harvest contingent on
approval by competent authorities;
–
Restrictions on conversion of forest land to other uses.
In some instances, the above mentioned tools are mandatory, in
others voluntary.
4.2. EU policies shaping forest use and forest
management
In addition to the
EU FS, the EU FAP and the Communication on Innovative and Sustainable
Forest-based Industries[64] which are the only forest
specific EU policy tools, a number of other EU policies are relevant
though not specifically related to forests and forestry. Many key actions in
the EU FAP refer to these policies, which are outlined below.
–
In the Natura 2000 network, forest habitats constitute almost
20 % of the designated terrestrial sites.
– EU climate policy recognises that to achieve its
overall targets, all sectors, including land use, land-use change and forestry
(LULUCF), must make a contribution[65].
The Effort Sharing Decision[66]
and the ETS directive[67]
include provisions for the Commission to assess options for including LULUCF in
the EU GHG reduction commitment.
– The Rural Development Regulation (2007-2013[68]) is the main instrument for financing of forest
measures and includes provisions for co-financing for afforestation, payments
for Natura 2000 areas, prevention and restoration and other forest
environmental measures as well as a wide range of investments in forest
management and wood processing.
Measures related to the use of advisory services by forest
holders contribute to promote the sustainable use of forests, increase
awareness in climate change, encourage mitigation actions and assist forest
holders in adaptation measures.
The cross-compliance mechanism can as well have an effect on
forest management, especially after the Health Check modification that
introduced water management in the Good Agricultural and Environmental
Condition (GAEC) framework with the new standard “Establishment of buffer
strips along water courses” that will be compulsory from 2012 at the latest.
Wooded buffer strips may be created or preserved within the implementation of
this policy.
– The Directive
on the promotion of energy from renewable sources (RES-D)[69] sets a binding target for the EU to
achieve a 20 % renewable energy share by 2020, in which the largest
contribution is expected to come from biomass from agriculture, forestry and
waste for heat and power generation as well as transport fuels.
–
The Action Plan on
Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy
(SCP/SIP), aims at improving the energy and environmental performances of
products. An EU Green public procurement policy for public bodies and
the revised EU Eco-label[70]
are part of this.
–
The Community plant health regime (CPHR[71])
aims at preventing the spreading of alien forest species or of organisms
harmful to forests. Its ongoing revision might introduce more flexibility
regarding limitations on the use and trade of forest reproductive material
and/or cope with the effects of climate change on pest and diseases as well as
their vectors.
–
Council Directive 1999/105/EC of 22 December 1999 on the
marketing of forest reproductive material[72]
recognizes that the choice of forest reproductive material is important for
forestry purposes and that this material should be genetically suited to the
various site conditions and be of high quality.
– The 7th Research Framework Program (FP7) launched the concept of
European
Technology Platforms in areas where Europe's competitiveness,
economic growth and welfare depend on important research and technological
progress. The Forest Technology Platform brings together stakeholders, under
industrial leadership, to define and implement a Strategic Research Agenda .
– FP7 also funds collaborative research on sustainable
production and management of biological resources from forest and on the
prediction of forthcoming ecological changes.
–
The Commission's JRC
work on remote sensing, climate change, forest monitoring, forest
fragmentation, fires and forest information systems. COST projects
have addressed Protected Forest Areas and NFIs.
– Current Cohesion Policy supports investments in
renewable energy and co-finances programmes that preserve and promote natural
areas and biodiversity.
– The EU Solidarity Fund [73] assists MS in dealing with damage caused by
major natural disasters including storms and forest fires.
– The EU Civil Protection Mechanism provides the
framework for organising mutual assistance between the MS for responding to
major disasters including forest fires and storms, which overwhelm the response
capacities of the affected MS[74].
– The
EU approach on natural and man-made disasters[75]
recently endorsed by the Council[76]
takes a multi hazard approach to risk assessment and management and identifies
forest fires as an important priority for EU work on risk assessment and
management.
– In order to ensure coherence, the inter-service group
on forestry within the Commission meets regularly to discuss relevant forest
related issues.
Question 3:
- Do you consider that EU and MS policies are sufficient to ensure that
the EU contributes to forest protection, including preparing forests for
climate change and conserving biodiversity in forests?
- In what areas, if any, do you think further action may be necessary?
How might this be organized, under the given policy framework or beyond?
4.3. Forest management and use
Sustainable forest management,
based on MCPFE principles, MS policies and requirements and supported by the EU
particularly through rural development provides an important means at forest
level for the transfer of policy to practice. Among the SFM practices supporting
forest protection are:
– Afforestation, creating new forests to enhance
carbon sequestration and enhance biodiversity on appropriate lands, to protect
human settlements and cultural landscapes while also raising long term
productive output;
– Fire prevention measures such as management of
combustible material, establishment and maintenance of fire breaks, forest
tracks, water supply points, appropriate choice of tree species, fixed forest
fire monitoring facilities and communication equipments to prevent catastrophic
fire spread.
–
Proper forest planning that can support the adaptation of
forest species composition by favouring more suitable tree species and breeds
or, within a species, a higher genetic variability.
–
Sustainable mobilisation and harvesting of wood as well as investments
in forestry operations to increase stability and resilience of forests against
climate change impacts, including reducing the risks of forest fires, pests and
storms.
–
Actively favouring tree species composition which is likely to
be better adapted to site and growing conditions under changing climatic
conditions including, inter alia, by the use of natural regeneration where
appropriate and possible.
–
Preserving endemic genetic resources and selecting those
elements of the existing gene pool that are best adapted to expected growing
conditions in the future. This may also involve the use of new varieties and
species.
–
Preventing the introduction
by international trade of new
pests and diseases, as well as their vectors (e.g. pinewood nematode in Portugal).
Question 4:
- How could the practical implementation of SFM be updated in order to upkeep
the productive and protective functions of forests and overall viability of
forestry, as well as enhance the resilience of EU forests in view of climate
change and biodiversity loss? ?
- What steps are required to ensure that the gene pool in forest
reproductive material can be successfully conserved in its diversity and adapted
to climate change?
4.4. Forest Information
Information about forest resources and condition is essential to
ensure that decisions made regarding forests bring greatest benefits in
socio-economic and ecological terms on all levels. Moreover, the EU has
reporting obligations towards the UNFCCC and the CBD that require reliable and
consistent forest information systems. Currently, information concerning
forests is held at several different levels:
· Forest inventories: National forest
inventories (NFIs) hold most of the required information on forest resources.
This information is not harmonised and is therefore of limited use at EU level.
Through various projects, the Commission has been investigating the
possibility:
–
to expand the scope of forest inventory systems beyond wood
production aspects so as to include the improved SFM indicators and criteria
endorsed by the MCPFE[77], as well as
socio-economic information.
–
to harmonize NFI[78]
in order to make them comparable.
· The
integrated administration and control system (IACS, co-funded by the EU rural
development fund) is used to manage and control not only direct payments, but
also certain area-based measures of the rural development policy (e.g.
agri-environment forestry measures).
· Forest
condition monitoring: Under
EU legislation, from 1987 to 2006, when the Forest Focus[79]
regulation expired, MS have monitored forest condition according to the
"scheme of large scale and intensive monitoring"[80].
Since 2007 there is no EU legal basis for
monitoring but the "FutMon" project under Life+[81]
is being supported with a view to develop future monitoring concepts.
·
Monitoring of
forest fires: The European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) is a voluntary approach, recognized by the
MS, the Commission and the European Parliament as an essential tool for forest
fire monitoring in Europe.
· Forest
classification: The
EEA has developed a forest typology[82]
which could eventually be used for European-level forest assessments on an
ecological basis but so far only few MS have tested it in their forest
information systems. Its adoption will still require considerable technical
work and resources.
The European Forest Data Centre (EFDAC) developed by the
Commission, capitalizes on existing forest information and monitoring databases
in the EU, integrates the European Forest Information and Communication
Platform (EFICP)[83],
and builds on several initiatives of the Commission[84].
EFDAC aims at becoming the focal point for forest information in Europe. It
currently includes all the spatially detailed data collected under past EU
regulations and the results of past projects.
Eurostat provides
yearly statistics on the production of and trade in wood and wood products for
the EU and EFTA countries. It works in conjunction with UNECE, FAO and ITTO
(International Tropical Timber Organisation) as part of a worldwide exercise,
using a single joint questionnaire based on a set of harmonised definitions.
These data could contribute to modelling the carbon contained in yearly wood
removals from the forest and stored in wood products. Eurostat also provides
yearly economic indicators for forestry, logging and FBI.
Aggregated data on forest
damage, except in the case of fires, do not provide any measure of the actual
level of damage. A system to monitor pest outbreaks in the EU does not
currently exist but might be needed considering the expected impacts of climate
change on distribution of harmful organisms. Furthermore, lack of
comparable and verifiable information has led to an incomplete picture about
GHG balances in forestry operations and their impact on forest biodiversity.
The need for more
harmonized, reliable and comprehensive information on forests is increasingly
recognized by the Commission, the MS and many economic operators. The recent
mid-term review[85]
of the EU FAP called for an enhancement of the existing forest information
systems. While some MS may have forest
information satisfying their own needs, it may not add up to information that
is helpful at EU or global levels.
Harmonised reporting on a more complete set of indicators could be an
effective way towards better information about forest use, forest functions and
ultimately forest protection. Better
information on forest carbon and sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products
is also essential to support forests and forestry to further effectively
contribute to climate change mitigation. The considerable difficulties
that recently arose in the formulation of EU submissions to international
processes, such as the Copenhagen climate conference have made this quite
clear.
Question 5:
Taking into account the various relevant
policy levels, is available forest information today sufficient to assess with
sufficient accuracy and consistency:
- The health and condition of EU forests?
- Their productive potential?
- Their carbon balance?
- Their protective functions (soils, water, weather regulation,
biodiversity)?
- The provision of services to society and their social function?
- Overall viability of forestry?
If it is insufficient, how should forest information be improved?
Are efforts towards harmonised[86]
data collection on forests sufficient?
What can the EU do to further develop and / or enhance forest
information systems?
5. Next steps
Many forests throughout Europe will increasingly be
challenged by climate change. Preparing to meet these challenges now is the
best way to ensure that forests can continue to deliver all their functions. The
purpose of this Green Paper is to encourage an EU-wide public debate and to
secure views on the future of forest protection and information policy, as well
as to provide elements for a possible update of the EU Forestry Strategy on
climate related aspects.
The European Institutions and all those interested –
organisations or private individuals – are invited to submit their comments on
the questions set out in the Green Paper as well as on any other issues
concerning forest protection and information that they wish to raise. The
consultation process will be articulated as follows:
A web-based public consultation will be open until 31 July
2010.
The Commission will organise a workshop and a stakeholders
meeting on this Green Paper in Brussels in June 2010.
The Commission will publish the stakeholders' contributions on
Internet and will provide its own feedback of the main outcomes of the
consultation.
The results of the public consultation will help shape the
further work of the Commission regarding the contribution the EU can make to
forest protection under a changing climate, including the information required
to achieve this.
MS and concerned stakeholders are kindly requested to submit
their replies to the Green Paper by 31 July 2010 at the latest. The replies
should be sent to the following address:
By mail:
European Commission
Directorate General for Environment
Unit B1: Forest, Soil and Agriculture
BU-9 04/029 B-1049 Brussels, Belgium
By e-mail:
ENV-U43-sector-forest@ec.europa.eu
It is important to read the specific privacy statement attached
to this consultation for information on how your personal data and contribution
will be dealt with. Professional organisations are invited to register in the
Commission register for Interest Representatives (http://:ec.europa.eu/transparency/regrin).
This register was set up in the framework of the European Transparency
Initiative with a view to provide the Commission and the public at large with
information about the objectives, funding and structures of interest
representatives.
[1] COM(2009)147
[2] Art. 5 of the EU Treaty
[3] UNCED report (Rio de Janeiro, 1992)Annex III, 2b
[4] http://www.cbd.int/forest/pow.shtml
[5] COM (2003) 251 -Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005
[6] COM (2008) 645
[8] Lisbon
MCPFE (1998)
Vienna MCPFE (2003 )
[9] Council Resolution (OJ 1999/C 56/01)
[10] COM (2006)302
[12] Global deforestation rate is ca. 13 M ha per year see http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/008/a0400e/a0400e00.htm for up to date figures.
[13] G. R. van der Werf et al: CO2 emissions from forest loss, Nature Geoscience (2), 2009
[14] Falinski,
J.-B.; Mortier, F., Revue forestière
française XLVIII, 1996.
[15] TBFRA
2000 - http://www.unece.org/timber/fra/welcome.htm
[16] SEC(2009)387,
section 10.2 "Forests"
[18] SEC(2009)1111:
[21] COM(2008)113
[22] Häglund, B.: The role of European forests in welfare creation, STORA ENSO presentation , 2003
[23] COM (2006)848
[25] Hetsch S. et al (2008): Wood resources availability and demands II -future wood flows in the forest and energy sector. European countries in 2010 and 2020,Geneva
[26] MCPFE"State of Europe's forests 2007""
[28] SOM varies from 0,71 % in arid
agricultural land to 6,65 %
in humid (Vallejo, R. et al (2005) MMA - Spain)
[30] EEA report 8/2009.
[31] "Water Protection Areas" Bayerischer Agrarbericht 2008
[33] TBFRA
2000-http://www.unece.org/trade/timber/fra/welcome.htm).
[34] MCPFE "State of Europe's Forests 2007"
[35] EU Member States, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Liechtenstein and Turkey
[36] Tomialojc and Wesolowski (2000). Biogeography ecology and forest bird communities
[37] COM (2009) 358
[38] Art. 17 HD report 2009 - http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/
[39] EEA Rep.n°4/2009
[40] BioSoil project / "Forest Focus"
[41] Ciais, P. et al. (2008): http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v1/n7/full/ngeo233.html
[42] Annual European Community greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2007 and inventory report 2009
[43] Lindroth, A. et al in Global Change Biology 2009-15
[45] Menenti, M.; Verstraete, M; Peltoniemi, J. (2000): Observing land from space: science, customers, and technology. Kluwer Academic
[46] Makarieva, A. et al.: Precipitation on land versus distance from the ocean: Evidence for a forest pump of atmospheric moisture, in: Ecological Complexity, Volume 6, Issue 3, 09/2009
[47] Murdiyarso, D.; Sheil, D.: How Forests Attract Rain: An Examination of a New Hypothesis., in: BioScience 59, 2009
[48] http://melbournecatchments.org
[49] Also natural events such as the ice ages have sometimes caused more abrupt changes in the occurrence and distribution of species.
[50] 4AR of IPCC, WG 1 www.ipcc.ch
[52] EEA rep. No 4/2008 / SEC(2009)387
[53] Colinas, C.; De Dios, V.; Fischer, Ch.: Vol. 33, No 1, 01/2007
[54] Gonzales, C (2008): Analysis of the oak decline in Spain "la seca". Thesis, SLU Uppsala
[55] Casalegno, S. et al., 2010 Forest Ecology and Management (in press)
[56] BOKU, EFI, IAFS, INRA (2008): Impacts of Climate Change on European forests and options for adaptation
[57] Lindner
et al. 2008 http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/euro_forests/full_report_en.pdf
[58] The Monthly Severity Rating explains fire danger on the basis of meteorological conditions
[59] Joint Research Centre-IES: European Forest Fire Information System, Forest fires in Europe 2008
[60] Westerling, A.L. et al: in: Science, Vol. 313. no. 5789 (08/2006)
[61] EFFIS newsletter September 2009
[62] “Making forests fit for Climate Change, a global view of climate-change impacts on forests and people and options for adaptation”, 2009.
[63] Winkel,
G. et al (2009): http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/pdf/ifp_ecologic_report.pdf
[64] COM(2008)113
[65] COM(2007)2 / COM(2005)35
[66] Decision No 406/2009/EC
[67] Directive 2009/29/EC
[68] Council Regulation (EC) 1698/2005
[69] Directive 2009/28/EC
[71] Council Directive 2000/29/EC
[72] OJ L 011 , 15/01/2000,
[73] Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002
[74] Council Decision 2007/779/EC
[75] COM(2009) 82
[76] Council Conclusions of 30 November 2009 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/NewsWord/en/jha/111537.doc
[78] COST E43 report. http://www.metla.fi/eu/cost/e43/
[79] Regulation (EC) 2152/2003
[80] http://www.icp-forests.org/
[81] Regulation (EC) No 614/2007
[84] INSPIRE, SEIS and GMES
[85] http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/euforest/index_en.htm
[86] In this context, "harmonized" has to be understood in the sense of making the information systems output comparable and compatible, and not rendering uniform field procedures.